pianist and medical doctor

Tag: 2019-07

  • 01(30): Think twice before swimming in warm freshwater lakes, rivers, and hot springs overseas?

    What comes to your mind when you think of people swimming in warm freshwater lakes and rivers? For me, this thought conjures pleasant images of people relaxing in these water bodies. Some might even relax in natural hot springs. Usually, all is well and people are just enjoying their time away from work: the rat race that plagues the lives of many Singaporeans. Such people would probably have gone overseas to partake in such an experience.

    Recently, I was learning about parasites as they piqued my curiosity. Parasitology is the study of parasites and is a category within microbiology, a basic medical science that is learnt in the pre-clinical phase of medical school. Other categories within microbiology include mycology (study of fungi, especially microscopic fungi), bacteriology (study of bacteria), and virology (study of viruses). This is a neat classification as microbiology is after all, the study of very small (micro-; at the scale of the micrometre) organisms, or if we want to be extremely precise: agents or entities (since viruses are not typically considered to be organisms).

    Within parasitology, there are further sub-categories: protozoa (unicellular eukaryotes), nematodes (roundworms), cestodes (tapeworms), trematodes (flukes), and ectoparasites (parasites which live on the outside of the host).

    The parasite that I wish to discuss in this post comes from the subcategory: protozoa. Even within the subcategory of protozoa, there are further categories! One way of classifying infectious protozoa would be the nature of their infections. For example, some protozoa can cause 1) GI (gastrointestinal) infections, some cause 2) CNS (central nervous system) infections, some cause 3) hematologic infections (the well-known malaria is caused by Plasmodium), while some protozoa cause 4) visceral infections and sexually transmitted infections.

    The organism that I wish to discuss today belongs to the group of protozoa which causes CNS infections. You might have heard about it or seen it being mentioned in newspaper articles. Its colloquial name is “brain-eating amoeba“, better known among the medical and scientific community as Naegleria fowleri, which was first identified in Australia, but is thought to have evolved in the US.

    N. fowleri can be found in warm lakes, ponds, rock pits, mud puddles, slow-flowing rivers. It can also be found in swimming pools, spas, wells, and municipal water which are all untreated. It can even be found in aquariums, and soil. There is currently no evidence that suggests that N. fowleri is able to survive in salt water. That is probably why it can usually only be found in freshwater. There are several species under the genus Naegleria but only the fowleri species (all known fowleri subtypes are believed to be equally dangerous) are known to be anthropopathogenic (causing human disease). This is a computer-simulated representation of the trophozoite form of the parasite:

    Like many other amoebae (unicellular eukaryotes), N. fowleri exists as a cyst (inactive form) when environmental conditions are not favourable. However, when conditions are favourable, N. fowleri transforms into a trophozoite, its active and feeding form which is pathogenic.

    Mechanism of infection by Naegleria fowleri

    The colloquial name for N. fowleri suggests that the microbe is just like an undead entity which munches and chews on your brain tissue as its primary source of nutrition. However, our brain tissue wouldn’t be their first choice. Think of how children wouldn’t usually prioritize the consumption of their greens! N. fowleri normally consumes bacteria. However, when N. fowleri infects us, it feeds on our brain tissue. The reason that N. fowleri infection is so associated with freshwater contact is that the parasite enters via the nose, and then to the cribriform plate. This means that infection occurs mostly from activities involving freshwater contact where water finds its way into the nose. Such activities would include swimming, and many water sports.

    Unfortunately, cases of such infection by N. fowleri have even been reported (though very rare) in people who dunk (sounds absolutely silly but that which Homo sapiens is capable of ironically knows no bounds) their heads in hot springs and people who irrigate their nostrils with neti pots that contain untreated tap water.

    As a consolation, there is no known evidence to suggest that N. fowleri can be transmitted between human beings.

    Current evidence suggests that the parasites are attracted to the chemicals that our neurons use for intercellular communication. Once in the nose, N. fowleri travels to the frontal lobe via the olfactory nerve. Look at this image below:

    When swimming in fresh water, the water makes its way into the nasal cavity and there, N. fowleri penetrates the mucus layer, and probably enters the cilia of olfactory receptor cells. As such, it is able to penetrate the cribriform plate and enter the olfactory nerve (responsible for our sense of smell). Note that for basal cells, and supporting cells, they do not have any passages which penetrate the cribriform plate. Only the olfactory receptor cells have axons which penetrate the cribriform plate on their way to the CNS.

    The olfactory nerve is known as the first cranial nerve (CN I), and it is the shortest of all 12 cranial nerves. After the cribriform plate, the olfactory nerves pass upward to several areas of the brain, such as the hypothalamus and amygdala, However, for the purposes of our discussion, the olfactory nerves terminate on the undersurface of the frontal cortex.

    In essence, after penetrating the nasal mucosa, the trophozoite migrates along mesaxonal (the mes- prefix comes from the Greek word ‘mesos’ which means middle/intermediate, and -axonal just refers to the axon/nerve fibre of the neuron) spaces of unmyelinated olfactory nerves which terminate at the olfactory bulb in the subarachnoid space, among many other terminal destinations. I imagine that one reason this particular parasitic infection is so deadly is that the subarachnoid space is quite vascularized and is a route of transmission of N. fowleri trophozoites to many other areas of the CNS. So it is not surprising that after the initial incubation period, N. fowleri infection is characterized by an abrupt onset of headache, fever, nausea, vomiting, encephalitis (inflammation of the brain).

    After the typical signs of a CNS infection, progression to seizures and then, coma, is rapid (usually over 3-7 days).

    The disease that is caused by this parasitic infection is officially known as Primary Amoebic Meningoencephalitis (PAM or PAME). The prognosis of PAM is extremely bleak as a vast majority of cases (>95%) end in death, which occurs an average of just 1 week after the initial onset of symptoms. PAM/PAME caused by N. fowleri has a worldwide distribution, and occurs most frequently in tropical areas and during hot summer months. Most cases of PAM due to N. fowleri infection have occurred in the US. However, this might be due to underreporting in other countries, and not simply due to a higher prevalence of PAM in the US. In many countries, autopsy is not standard.

    Diagnosis of PAM is so problematic because:

    Firstly, early in the course of PAM, PAM often resembles purulent bacterial meningitis (PBM), and cannot be easily distinguished from PBM.

    Secondly, PAM progresses incredibly quickly, and rapid diagnostics must be developed for early detection. Must of the diagnosis is based on patient history (e.g. whether the patient has recently swum in warm fresh water, along with associated symptoms). The gold standard (for now) is not achieved until the trophozoites are isolated and identified from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or brain tissue. While N. fowleri does grow easily in culture, this can nevertheless still take a few days. For a disease like PAM where an infection will kill in about a week, a few days is just simply too long, and often this means the difference between life and death.

    Treatment for PAM secondary to Naegleria fowleri infection

    Intravenous amphotericin B is the current standard of care. Amphotericin B works by disrupting the selective permeability of plasma membranes. It works by binding to ergosterol (the sterol in fungi cell membranes). Though not a fungi, N. fowleri has ergosterol in its cell membrane. Hence, Amphotericin B, which is normally an antifungal medication, can also be used as an antiprotozoal medication for otherwise-untreatable diseases caused by certain protozoa.

    In this case, Amphotericin B binds to ergosterol in the cell membrane of N. fowleri, giving rise to a pore which allows potassium ions and other small molecules to leak out from the cell, ultimately leading to cytolysis. Unfortunately, having great results in the lab doesn’t always necessarily translate to a similar level of success in actual patients.

    Amphotericin B is a ‘last-resort’ drug as it has high toxicity, and its use in actual patients are not as successful in actual patients compared to what initial lab experiments predict.

    So, just bear this all of the above in mind before you decide to venture out into warm ponds, freshwater rivers and lakes for a swim, especially during the hot summer months.

    Well, I’m kidding. The odds are that you’re probably going to be fine. Nevertheless, take caution. Don’t dunk your head in the water at a natural hot spring for goodness’ sake.

    There have only been a few hundred cases of Naegleria fowleri infection worldwide since the parasite was documented from the 1960s. Naegleria fowleri is actually quite common, but its infection is rare. However, if you are infected, then the prognosis isn’t particularly optimistic (>95% death).

    I hope you have learnt more about this interesting parasite from reading this article!

    Yours faithfully,
    Nic Loh
    23 July 2019

    References & Further Reading
    1. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/warm-weather-stirs-brain-eating-amoeba-warning/story?id=24552241
    2. https://www.webmd.com/brain/brain-eating-amoeba#1
    3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/olfactory-nerve
    4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/naegleria-fowleri
    5. https://slideplayer.com/slide/7225568/
    6. http://humanphysiology.academy/Neurosciences%202015/Chapter%201/P.1.1.2%20Compound%20Action%20Potential.html
    7. https://images.app.goo.gl/dTh1i8e9Hau92jkY9
    8. http://www.cdipd.org/index.php/naegleriasis-global-impact

  • 01(29): What do beta-lactams and perhaps the smallest known living organism have in common?

    Yesterday, I was watching a video where the teacher had asked his students a question. He had just discussed how penicillins and cephalosporins can be used against certain bacteria, right after talking about Mycoplasma.

    The teacher then asked the class: “Which is Mycoplasma more sensitive to: penicillins or cephalosporins?” One student raised his hand and answered, “Penicillin”. To this, the teacher replied, “That is wrong.” Immediately, the teacher asked another student, “So, what do you think Mycoplasma is more sensitive to: penicillins or cephalosporins?” Seeing that the first student was wrong when he had answered the question, the second student was perhaps quite confident that he would get it correct if he answered cephalosporins, and that was exactly what the second student did. Unfortunately, he was wrong! I absolutely saw it coming though, as this teacher is known to ask such trick questions to test students’ concepts. The teacher was visibly lamenting that they both got it wrong.

    This was obviously a trick question. Mycoplasma has an equal sensitivity (better seen as an equal lack of sensitivity) to both penicillin and cephalosporins because while both classes of drugs work on bacterial cell walls, it has to be understood that Mycoplasma does not have a cell wall, and specifically, a cell wall with peptidoglycan! Consider this similar scenario. A person has no ears, and cannot effectively listen or hear anything. Which would give him a more enjoyable music-listening experience: earbuds or headphones? Hahaha!

    The teacher’s original question is good because it reinforces the concepts which students are taught. This is how students actively learn: by seeing how the dots connect. A student can learn these three things separately: 1) the mechanism of action of cephalosporins; 2) the mechanism of action of penicillins; 3) the characteristics of Mycoplasma. Questions like the one asked by the teacher are effective in getting students to integrate the knowledge that they have learnt separately, at least from anecdotal experience.

    As of the time of writing, Mycoplasma is arguably the smallest known living organism. What defines life? What defines a living organism? While there isn’t a unanimous consensus within the scientific community regarding the definition of life, a majority within the scientific community agree that prions, plasmids, transposons, bacteriophages, viruses all do not constitute life. As such, bacteria would generally constitute the smallest and “simplest” life forms. They are prokaryotes and are unicellular.

    Most bacteria have cell walls. Why do they need a cell wall? Well, they need cell walls to prevent osmotic burst as their cell membranes are unstable due to a lack of sterols, which confer stability to the cell membrane. Recall that the cell membrane consists of mostly consists a lipid bilayer. The difference between a phospholipid and a triglyceride is that instead of having 3 fatty acid chains attached to a glycerol backbone in triacylglycerols, there are only 2 fatty acid chains attached to a glycerol backbone in phospholipids. A polar negatively-charged phosphate group takes the place of where the third fatty acid would have been connected. As such, the phosphate group, along with the carboxylic esters formed between the glycerol backbone and the two fatty acids constitute the hydrophilic head of the phospholipid while the tails of the two fatty acid constitute the hydrophobic tails of the phospholipid. What I have explained is beautifully illustrated in the diagram below.

    With the hydrophilic heads of phospholipids facing the extracellular fluid and the cytosol, polar and charged substances are not able to diffuse through the cell membrane. However, despite being a polar molecule, water is able to diffuse through the cell membrane because it is a very small molecule.

    As such, if not for the cell wall, bacteria would undergo osmotic burst or cytolysis due to excess water diffusing into the cell (we have just previously established that water is able to diffuse through the lipid bilayer despite being a polar molecule), and that the cell membrane is not large enough to accommodate the excess fluid.

    This is where the cell wall comes in to help the bacteria resist cytolysis. But before we discuss how the cell wall, let us first discuss which living organisms have cell walls and their variations.

    For the sake of our discussion, let us ignore plants and non-infectious agents since I am interested in infectious agents. For eukaryotic infectious agents, we have fungi, protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Of these eukaryotic infectious agents, only fungi have cell walls. As for prokaryotes, we basically only have bacteria, and most bacteria have cell walls. Here is a diagram showing the structure of a fungi cell wall.

    The difference between the cell walls in fungi and in bacteria is in the composition. Fungi cell walls consist of chitin, a polymer of N-acetylglucosamine, which is a glucose derivative. On the other hand, bacteria cell walls consist of peptidoglycan. The first step to understanding peptidoglycan is simply looking at its name. Consider “peptido-” and “-glycan”. This tells us that peptide bonds and sugar or sugar derivatives are involved in peptidoglycan’s structure. Consider this excellent diagram below which illustrates the structure of peptidoglycan beautifully:

    With a cell wall, bacteria are able to resist cytolysis.

    The answer is that Mycoplasma has sterols within its cell membrane for stability. This presence of sterols within the cell membrane is unique among prokaryotes and it strongly suggests that sterols function as regulators of membrane fluidity.

    The most well-known sterol that probably all of us have heard of is none other than cholesterol. The prefix “chole-” means bile or gall, which is a fluid produced in the liver. Bile consists mainly of water (97%), bile salts (0.7%), other substances, and of course, cholesterol.

    Let’s take a look at the diagram involving peptidoglycan again. Do you see those pentaglycine cross-links? As the term suggests, these cross-links consist of 5 (penta) glycine residues linked together, with one terminal glycine joined to L-Lysine while another terminal glycine is joined to D-Alanine.

    Penicillin works by binding to penicillin-binding proteins, which ultimately leads to cytolysis. One such protein is transpeptidase, the enzyme which catalyses the pentaglycine cross-links that connect the amino group on one N-Acetylmuramic acid to the amino group on another N-Acetylmuramic acid. When penicillin binds to transpeptidase, penicillin inhibits transpeptidase.

    As such, with penicillin, these pentaglycine cross-links do not form, and the cell wall is not as sturdy as it should be, causing the bacterium to be more susceptible to cytolysis.

    In the above image, we have the core structures of penicillin above (1), and the cephalosporins below (2). The part highlighted in red is known as the beta-lactam ring. It is named as such because a lactam is a cyclic amide (which is evident from C=O and the C-N bonds within the red 4-membered ring), and it is a beta-lactam because if the peptide bond were hydrolysed, then the nitrogen atom would be attached to the beta-carbon. The takeaway is that both penicillins and cephalosporins both belong to a broader category of antibiotics known as beta-lactams.

    In all 20 standard naturally occuring amino acids, the amino group is bonded to the alpha-carbon, which is defined as the carbon immediately adjacent to the carboxylic acid group. It then follows that the beta-carbon would be immediately adjacent to the alpha-carbon and so on.

    NB: This is why the most common ketone body in our bodies, 3-hydroxybutyrate, is also called beta-hydroxybutyrate (not technically a ketone). In beta-hydroxybutyrate, the hydroxyl group is attached to the beta-carbon. This is also why mitochondrial lipolysis is also known as beta-oxidation.

    Some bacteria contain enzymes known as beta-lactamases, and as its name suggests, they degrade and thus inactivate beta-lactams. Such enzymes can be thought of as bacteria’s defence against our antibiotics. Bacteria which are capable of producing beta-lactamases include Staphylococcus, Neisseria gonorrheae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, etc.

    In response, to these beta-lactamases, we stubborn human beings who refuse to succumb to bacteria have developed what is known as beta-lactamase inhibitors. This is our strategy of combating the resistance put forth by the bacteria in the form beta-lactamases which break down our beta-lactam antibiotics. So, we developed a weapon against their weapon which worked against our initial weapon.

    It wouldn’t be surprising if bacteria develop an enzyme which inactivates our synthetic beta-lactamase inhibitors. Then perhaps, we need to come up with something called the beta-lactamase inhibitor-inactivator inhibitor. This is a vicious cycle that may just carry on: beta-lactamase (inhibitor-inactivator) (inhibitor-inactivator) (inhibitor-inactivator) (inhibitor-inactivator) ad infinitum!

    Yours faithfully,
    Nic Loh
    10 July 2019

    References & Further Reading
    1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0070216108603111
    2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bile
    3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/penicillin-binding-proteins